They sell things that come in cups, or with napkins. Lots of people cycle/run/walk here instead of driving, seems pretty stupid.

Taking away the bins doesn’t mean you don’t produce rubbish…

Edit: I think there is still a bin IN the cafe, but most people eat/drink outside. Lots of people asking staff where the bins are. Still hypocritical I think though? (And still mildly infuriating to remove well used bins!)

  • liv@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    This has been happening in New Zealand for a while. The theory seems to be that bins attract more litter and are a hazard to wildlife.

    I was sceptical at first but it actually seems to work.

    Perturbs me that they are selling food though. Surely yhe food sellers should have bins for which they are responsible in their immediate vicinity.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t think it works. I think the resulting litter is just more distributed and therefore harder to register. Instead of an overflowing trash can, it’s a napkin here, a cup there, and a lot of it ends up eaten by wildlife or in waterways so not very visible.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        No, a lot of people are actual decent human beings and understand the simple concept of packing out your own garbage.

        If someone sees a full garbage, they aren’t suddenly going to become a decent person, no they add to the pile making it worse. Don’t give them that option, and well most people actually turn decent. Since to throw it on the ground and get caught is different than just “adding to the pile”. It’s amazing what a little public embarrassment can fix.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            And what if someone decides to empty their garbage from their vehicle filling it up and now it’s not being emptied until the next morning?

            I’m guessing you would want someone standing there to empty it the second it gets full….?

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Well first of all, yes.

              Second, pretty sure that’s “dumping” and not legal, so record their license plate and send em a fine.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                Using a public bin to empty your vehicle is illegal? That’s what the bins are for dude. Wow, you really have no clue about any of this do you?

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Depends on your locality but yeah, if you fill up a public bin with trash that can be illegal. You’ll figure out things like that one day, when you grow up.

                • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  In the US it isn’t legal to dispose of your house hold trash in a public trash can. You can throw a few things away but if you show up with a few bags of junk you can get in trouble.

  • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    there is a bin in the café according to you lmao.

    this is ridiculous tbh, protecting wildlife is more important than your convenience in that place lmao, you’re annoyed that you have to walk inside to throw your trash?? wtf lol.

    • Nighed@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      The only problem with the bins that got removed had with wildlife was when wasps nested in them one year. They had sprung loaded flaps

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    “To support our commitment to reducing the number of covid cases, we have elected to discontinue counting them. We kindly ask all infected to kindly die at home.”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    That’s not how human behavior works…

    Someone thinks they’re very clever and they aren’t.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Saying they are committed to producing no rubbish on site on a sign, then selling things that result in rubbish, is hypocritical.

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Food that comes on reused plates and/or drinks in reused cups. Much of the advertising around littering prevention was developed by industries who saw profits in creating a lot of single use items that wanted to shift the blame for any litter to individuals instead of them. When you see an empty bottle of Pepsi floating in a pond, Pepsi deserves more criticism than whoever dropped that specific bottle since they are the ones who brought it into the world, and they do it on a much larger scale than any 1 person could ever manage.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Food that comes on reused plates and/or drinks in reused cups.

            The food all came in packaging, and stuff breaks or gets dropped, NOTHING is ever rubbish free dude…

            • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              If you are a business generating rubbish, it is your moral responsibility to account for that rubbish. The business selling stuff doesn’t have their employees filling their pockets with the bulk food packaging rubbish at the end of the day to dispose of at home; they have their own bins. They just don’t want to be responsible for all the rubbish they generate cause it costs them more money than trying to put that responsibility on someone else.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                If you are a business generating rubbish, it is your moral responsibility to account for that rubbish.

                Yes and if you take them their garbage they gave you with their food, they will deal with it. They just don’t want to deal with the public’s granola bar wrappers, so they are now where they control the garbage.

                If you bring them your garbage and they dispose of it in their bins, does that not fit your moral requirement? Or do you want bins every 10 feet to satisfy your laziness? Can’t walk balk to where you paid for stuff to return the garbage….,?

                You seem to think there is no bins… obviously the cafe will produce garbage, I never stated they wouldn’t. I was pointing out people like you, that there HAS TO STILL BE BINS. So yes, they do have a way of dealing with it. So take your rubbish to them, and they will gladly deal with it. Does that work?

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I don’t see a cafe in the picture? Are you sure this isn’t down the trail and the cafe still has a garbage…?

            Cafe deals with its own garbage, and I’m sure if you asked to put your napkin in it, they wouldn’t have a single issue.

            • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Going from OPs description as the sign doesn’t show the area. There is a couple benches in the background, which leads me to believe it’s reasonably accurate.

              Obv the situation is a little different if OPs not being honest.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Even then, the cafe will take your garbage and put in their bin. They don’t want their refuse filled up with public waste as the charge would fall on them.

                Clearly they have a way of still dealing with waste…. And why wouldn’t they take their own waste back? People are going off the deep end without even stopping to think for half a fucking second.

            • Nighed@feddit.ukOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Photo is under the red dot (you can see the play area in the background of the photo) nvm, no you can’t. But that’s where it is!

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                So the inside of the cafe obviously has bins that could be used… and they don’t want to PUBLIC non cafe people filling it……

                Do people even stop to think for 2 seconds before bitching?

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s a cafe area; they are giving you trash with your meal/drink, not providing a bin for it, then expecting you to pack it out.

      Expecting people to packout the garbage they brought with them is one thing (that still doesn’t get followed); but if you’re going to provide the public with trash, you’ve gotta give them somewhere to dispose of it.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I can see taking things that I brought with me like granola bar wrappers and water bottles, but if you have a cafe selling cheeseburgers, fountain drinks, and coffee, it seems dumb to expect people to carry all that home rather than allowing them to throw it away at the same place they bought and consumed it.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah but the Cafe does have bins inside. It’s just the park that removed the public waste bins.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Well, I hadn’t seen that mentioned anywhere, so if that’s the case I agree it’s not a big deal to pack your trash back to the cafe.

    • Nate@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      While this is the ideal outcome, in reality people are just going to throw their trash in the bushes.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        People who do this already did even when bins were still there. Because placing rubbish into pocket or backpack is so hard!

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Littering used to be illegal most places. It should be illegal pretty much every public place. If you’re breaking the law, you’re criminalizing yourself. This is like saying we shouldn’t resurface roads because it criminalizes speeders.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    You can always take your trash with you instead of expecting someone else to take it for you. The culture of throwing shit away instead of reusing, and reducing, is so ubiquitous, that’s the infuriating thing.

    • Nighed@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      They should give me tea in a mug instead of a waxed paper cup (and plastic lid!) then!

      • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Does the cafe not have a bin?

        I’m not sure if it’s a thing by you, but it’s common where I live to carry your own thermos.

  • HorseFD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is the reason given in Australia by Parks Victoria

    LEAVE NO TRACE

    Advocate for minimal-impact practices wherever you go. Many people are surprised to find no bins in national parks. Waste attracts native animals, which can change their natural behaviour and harm both natural and cultural sites, as well as your personal belongings.

    Always bring rubbish bags (and one for your neighbour) and take all your rubbish home. Help educate others about the importance of leaving the park pristine, minimising your impact on the delicate balance of the ecosystem.

      • Syun@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah, they threw LNT straight out the window and down the open manhole with flames shooting out of it with great delight. If you search for pics of the place, claiming “leave no trace” is beyond farcical.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    We survive that way in Japan with almost no bins. Of course the odd person litters, but most don’t; if we can pack it in, we can pack it out. Now, if there were no bin inside the cafe, that would be idiotic.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I do have the impression that Japanese people have a much stronger “social responsibility” with public stuff compared to most westerners.

      • AAA@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        *all westerners

        Really. Japanese society has a lot of issues on its own, but there’s also a lot to learn from them.

        • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          I disagree with the broad brush as not all westerners nor easterners would fit into that (see rural areas that suddenly got disposable travel income), you are right that Japan is far from perfect but we could all benefit from some exchange

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Whilst this is not wrong and shame is a big motivator in Japan, some otherwise bored cops fining literers for a while would probably prevent that situation. On the other hand, I think maintaining some bins (infra to install and hardware + maintenance cleaning and maybe the odd security check) would be cheaper, beeter, and friendlier

  • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I fully support the choice to remove the bins. I visited a beauty spot in Scotland recently that has a coffee van in the carpark. The young couple I took there went to add their empty cups to the already overflowing bin, and were baffled when I insisted they take them to the car, which was ten steps away. “But there’s a bin!” Yes you numpties, and the wind is already spreading its contents everywhere. Be part of the solution, not the problem.

    • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      there should be a rule that, if you sell stuff, which produces rubbis - you have to provide enough bins for said trash.

      • jimbel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        In my opinion in forests or nature parks everyone has the responsibility to behave respectful towards nature. This means do not even cause rubbish. If someone wants to sell stuff, then do not sell disposables. Instead serv in glasses or similar. On the other hand people should not buy disposables in nature parks. Just bring your own stuff e.g. thermos flask.

    • Nighed@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I think it’s a pretty good description. Has a tarmac car park, cafe, bike hire, 3 go ape routes, wheelchair accessible routes and until recently, bins!

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        You should look up the definition of “gentrification.” There are a ton of options that don’t suggest that the homeless people in the forest are being forced out and replaced with wealthier homeless people.

        Maybe “commercialized” would be a better word choice? Alternatively, “developed” or “sanitized?”

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          What does homelessness have to do with anything? Gentrification isn’t specifically about homelessness, I don’t see anyone else mentioning it before now… where did you pull that from?

          Gentrification seems to mean the rapid renovation of an area to appeal to a wealthier crowd, which this could easily cover.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Poor people won’t feel at home if there isn’t trash strewn everywhere. They’d probably avoid going to that place.

          • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Generally, usage of the term “gentrification” refers to the improvement of neighborhoods - or other places where people live, like apartment complexes - and, due to increased cost of living, the displacement of the people who used to live there. Displacement of less wealthy current residents when gentrification occurs is so common that it’s implied. If it weren’t, people wouldn’t have such low opinions of gentrification.

            If a forest has been gentrified, therefore, then - if you interpret “gentrified” in the same way - it follows that people who have been living there have been displaced. And since those people were living in a forest - not in a cabin in a forest - they’re necessarily homeless. Since OP didn’t say that they were building houses or apartments in the forest, that would mean that the wealthier people who displaced them were also homeless.

            Since the context was another commenter calling “gentrified forest” a cursed phrase, I don’t think I’m alone in thinking that.

        • Nighed@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          You are right, I was thinking the definition more being taking it up market, fancier etc. didn’t realise the term was more for the human effect.

  • Pondis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Sounds to me like they just dont want to empty the bins any more. I suspect after a few months of picking rubbish off the floor, the bins will be back.

    Or not and everyone will complain and stop going.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m on board with this. Don’t bring rubbish into woodland areas; and if you do bring it - take it back with you.

    I’m sure the bins were very convenient - but its a convenience that only helps you leave trash in the woodland for someone else to collect. And as others have pointed out, the rubbish can cause problems even if it is all put in the bin.

    So yeah, I can see that it is mildly frustrating - but I don’t think ‘take your rubbish home’ is too much of an ask.

    • dickalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, I agree but if you know anything about human behavior, you would realize all this paragraph you wrote was for nothing because people are going to do what people do

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I’ve just come back from a holiday which involved lots of hiking in mountains and woodlands. It’s rare to see bins out there, and yet somehow the places are clean. But please tell me more about human behaviour. Getting insulted by strangers on the internet is so fun.

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    We have a commitment to producing no rubbish on-site. Well, we had one, but then budget cuts took away our garbage bins, so now I guess you have a commitment to producing no rubbish on-site.

  • Syun@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    The places with the fewest places to deposit one’s trash are always the ones with the most litter. Always.

    If someone wants another person to adapt a behavior, from a purely practical standpoint, that person must make the other person’s job easier or it will simply not work to get them to adapt. If this wasn’t a forest (such as it is, it being the UK), the only proper thing to do would be to dump as much trash there as possible while demanding the bins back until they get the message and cave in. I could write a whole book here about how the packaging industry paid lobbyists and PR firms to put the blame on consumers for the useless crap they make existing in the first place, and shaming them into keeping it out of sight and thus out of mind. I won’t. But it’s a tale vile enough that it convinced me that there’s a time and a place for littering as protest. The woods aren’t the place.

    Besides, there ARE receptacles that are critter resistant. This is an absolute cop out, and seeing how landscaped the area is, a couple of bins would hardly scar the landscape. This is pure crap. I looked the place up, and it’s NOT the kind of place where you deny people trash receptacles, nor is it the kind of place you can credibly base your argument on “we don’t want animals to get used to people”. Good lord, what a bunch of idiocy.