The problem is that the fans of Palworld are actually fans of Pokemon and they will defend it like a Pokemon game.
The problem is that the fans of Palworld are actually fans of Pokemon and they will defend it like a Pokemon game.
they would have to make the content available offline
Well did they confirm that something you buy isn’t? It’s only a platform and It’s more about the developers that should be doing that.
So it must be “Rent” now? Logically you still purchase a subscription. So this is a very weird solution.
A better solution would be that it has information on what you’re buying. “You can use this even if the game is removed”, “You can play this online and even without starting up Steam”, “Dedicated servers will be released when the game is stopped”, etc etc
RISC-V for that though, no?
That joke is extremely yesterday
vim is the daemon’s lettuce
The “20 years later” next to it is perfect
Buddy. I said “some people”. If you want to start calling names, and you’re talking about reddit, at least don’t be a hypocrite with your “i talk for everybody” mentality. Do you know what “some” means?
Anyways, you talked bout your phone and gave your perspective, I talked about mine and gave mine. The only valid point you have is that it should be compared to others in the same segment, which I did. Because I didn’t mention my own phone in my original reply. I just replied to your personal experience and I gave mine about how some people do not want that and want good battery life, with a personal example.
If you’re talking about comparing it to others in the segment, I think you’re either reading biased sources or are just lying about it. https://www.tomsguide.com/news/google-pixel-8-battery-life “they didn’t quite live up to the standard set by phones in their price range” Literally one of the first results for “google pixel battery”
Now please, there are other people that want other things in the world. No need to be an asshole about it.
You can disagree all you want. I am not here to discuss it. You asked why and I explained why.
No need to argue with people that don’t fall within your own demographic.
C isn’t too hard if you learn about how memory and pointers work, which seems to be something Rust tries to get away from. So I’m not sure it would make you a better C programmer.
I only have something against the syntax, but nothing against anything else about it, nor is my comment meant as a negative against the language. What I referred to was simply about how that stupid sentence is not a good comment and completely personal opinion. I am sure a lot of programming languages would have gotten the same label at one point in time. And many times they have been superseded by the next big thing.
For “some people” it is a big selling point. Which was how I worded my post.
I think only their way of emulating play store apps is heavy on the battery. But I could be mistaken.
I have an Oukitel and it uses 10% per day with medium usage. GPS and some video calling uses 20% on a day. Before that I used another Oukitel that only had a 720p screen. I could go for 20+ days on a single charge with not much usage.
These 1 charge per day devices are horrendous.
It’s ok if you don’t travel a lot, or always go home. But I tend to travel and be gone for the weekends.
I think you’re correct except for “having Rust in the Kernel is a bet on the future”. That’s something the techbro’s would say.
Most important thing for some people: the battery of the pixel sucks balls
Too many emojis. Just make a table and put the emojis in there.
“Hey bro I got a great idea”