I’m tired with this anti-cheat trend. It’s not a confirmation of any sort but still… i don’t want Dark and Darker to be “borked” for gaming on Linux.
With some many companies considering that option, is this far more effective for an anti-cheat ?
I’m tired with this anti-cheat trend. It’s not a confirmation of any sort but still… i don’t want Dark and Darker to be “borked” for gaming on Linux.
With some many companies considering that option, is this far more effective for an anti-cheat ?
“I’m OK with companies using incredibly shitty, intrusive software practices because I don’t think they’ll affect me personally” is such a shit take for so many reasons, to name a few:
giving software kernel access, especially when it does not or should not need kernel access, is a security risk, and does open the door for malicious actors to take advantage of vulnerabilities even if the software is not malicious in and of itself
occasionally, intensively intrusive programs like this do break things unintentionally, which can lead to all sorts of fun issues. StarForce DRM is a good example from years past.
just because you do not have anything on your PC that you consider sensitive, does not mean that applies to everyone.
Kernel level anticheat can be bypassed. It’s usually not cheap/easy, but it can and has been done. Meaning you are giving up all of this, for no real benefit.
these are just the few I can think of immediately.
That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying “I’m ok with Intrusive software practices that provide a tangible benefit (fuck cheaters) because I air gap my shit.”
that’s an interesting claim, how do you use online multiplayer games and discord while “air gapped”?
and again, your “tangible benefit” is rendered largely moot by the fact that you can absolutely get around kernel anticheat.