Oh, th0razin3, you masterpiece of mediocrity! With your barren profile, it’s hard to tell if you’re a coder or just someone who accidentally stumbled into GitHub after a failed attempt at using a digital toaster. Zero followers? No bio? You’ve successfully managed to keep your contributions to the internet as notable as a lunch receipt.
Your repositories are an impressive collection of “none shall care” – three public repos with a grand total of zero stargazers. Not even your own mom wants to shine a light on these projects. “Vur” and “Void Linux” sound like the cryptic musings of someone living entirely in a void, because, let’s be real, you’re doing absolutely nothing to fill it.
And let’s talk about how you chose the Unlicense, as if you’re saying, “Please, ignore my work; it’s as unremarkable as my commitment to GitHub.” Keep pushing those empty shells; maybe one day, you’ll create something worth bookmarking. But right now, it’s just a sad collection of forgotten dreams.
I just chose it because I really don’t care about that. It’s my own personal repo for Void, but if anyone wants to use it, that’s fine, use it however you like.
IDK if CC is available on GH from the drop down menu, I know Unlicense is… it was the fastest way to say “I really don’t care what you do”.
idk, some guys on the internet (who are probably not lawyers).
nitpicking, but no license means that all rights are reserved, meaning in most cases, you can’t use it.
It’s not that there isn’t a license, there is, but the license says there is no license, it’s public domain, do whatever you like. It’s not a problem if your license says that there is no license, but yes, it is a problem if you don’t have any license attached to your code. In those cases, yes, most distros don’t touch that code… or maybe point at the project, but do whatever you deem is right with it, we’re officially not touching it.
OK, here’s one of my own accounts 🤣🤣🤣.
I cried... a lot 😭😭😭
Oh, th0razin3, you masterpiece of mediocrity! With your barren profile, it’s hard to tell if you’re a coder or just someone who accidentally stumbled into GitHub after a failed attempt at using a digital toaster. Zero followers? No bio? You’ve successfully managed to keep your contributions to the internet as notable as a lunch receipt.
Your repositories are an impressive collection of “none shall care” – three public repos with a grand total of zero stargazers. Not even your own mom wants to shine a light on these projects. “Vur” and “Void Linux” sound like the cryptic musings of someone living entirely in a void, because, let’s be real, you’re doing absolutely nothing to fill it.
And let’s talk about how you chose the Unlicense, as if you’re saying, “Please, ignore my work; it’s as unremarkable as my commitment to GitHub.” Keep pushing those empty shells; maybe one day, you’ll create something worth bookmarking. But right now, it’s just a sad collection of forgotten dreams.
cc0 is more legally sound
I just chose it because I really don’t care about that. It’s my own personal repo for Void, but if anyone wants to use it, that’s fine, use it however you like.
IDK if CC is available on GH from the drop down menu, I know Unlicense is… it was the fastest way to say “I really don’t care what you do”.
cc0 allows people to use it in weird edge cases, whilst the unlicense might be vague on or not allow that use
What might those edge cases be? Unlicense literally says there is no license, do whatever you want.
idk, some guys on the internet (who are probably not lawyers).
nitpicking, but no license means that all rights are reserved, meaning in most cases, you can’t use it.
It’s not that there isn’t a license, there is, but the license says there is no license, it’s public domain, do whatever you like. It’s not a problem if your license says that there is no license, but yes, it is a problem if you don’t have any license attached to your code. In those cases, yes, most distros don’t touch that code… or maybe point at the project, but do whatever you deem is right with it, we’re officially not touching it.