Xylight@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoApparently Bluesky lets you require a sign in to view a postlemdro.idimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageApparently Bluesky lets you require a sign in to view a postlemdro.idXylight@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square36fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareseh@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agowhats wrong with it? i mean its up to the author if they want to make them exclusive to signed in users
minus-squarestinerman@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoNot the OP, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. I do think it’s a little odd given that the security is at the client and not in the protocol. As others have mentioned already, if you use skyview.social, you can see the posts anyway.
whats wrong with it? i mean its up to the author if they want to make them exclusive to signed in users
Not the OP, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. I do think it’s a little odd given that the security is at the client and not in the protocol. As others have mentioned already, if you use skyview.social, you can see the posts anyway.