• Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why would anyone put up with the attack that is advertising? If it requires you to watch ads, it’s not worth it. You wouldn’t sit through a free movie if it meant a stranger showing up every few minutes and offering to let you rim them, (it’s not that no one wants what their offering, it’s that they don’t care whether you’re interested or not. They’re still going to show you their asshole) why would you allow a similar violation of your mind?

    • RaymondLuxuryYacht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m, that’s how over the air broadcasting is funded. You watch commercials. It’s been this way since television started.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Similar violation? How in the actual fuck is watching a few ads in anyway whatsoever even close to what you described?

      Why would anyone put up with the attack that is advertising?

      It’s quite simple because not think the exact way you do and have the same priorities.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        you’re right. at least, depending on the person, there’s a chance rimming could be enjoyable. not so with ads that quiz you.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I never claimed that ads aren’t annoying just that it’s bizarre to compare it to sexual harassment.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How old are you? The reason I ask is because it was very common to watch movies with ads via free-to-air TV in the 90s, at least in families that didn’t have cable TV.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      a free movie

      That’s the point. The movie isn’t free. You pay for the admission by rimming that guy. If you don’t want to do that, go to a different cinema and pay with money.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What country and what law?

      Quick edit: you know, if Hulu doesn’t include anywhere that they do this, it could be seen as additional consideration (in the legal contractual term of the word - basically, what each party provides for the other) in order for Hulu to provide its service that wasn’t disclosed.

      Of course, that just means we’ll get yet another “We updated our terms and while we’re at it we’re increasing our rates $3/month. Fuck You.” email and that’s that.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        People say stuff like that and I’m like, what’s the actual law? “It feels bad so it’s probably illegal.”

        This particular brand of bullshit is so new I doubt there’s any legislation out there. Maybe an existing consumer protection law could be bent to fit?

    • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      For one you don’t have to answer it or anything. Many streaming platforms have been doing this for awhile.

      • Muehe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not what OP said over on the (now deleted) Reddit post:

        So the ad was supposed to play in that black box and this is a bug?

        I had Bob’s Burgers on in the background but was playing a game with my kid. The silence caught my attention, but not at first. At first I assumed it was a, “choose your commercial” thing.

        After some more time I thought maybe it was asking if I was still watching, that’s when I looked up to see this

        I waited, nothing. I made a verbal comment and the whole family started looking. We waited, nothing.

        I grabbed my phone, snapped the pic, made the post (but didn’t actually post it), and it was still sitting there.

        I guessed an answer, got it right, and the show came back

        Then I hit “post” to actually make the post.

        Some people say it went away on its own. Others say, like me, they had to answer, and others said even after answering it didn’t go away

        I’ve had Bob’s Burgers on all morning and I’ve yet to see this again

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I heard their women don’t work after giving birth. Sometimes up to a year!

            How disgusting is that?! Think of all that lost productivity, lost profit to day care, no lunches at local fast slop, no wear and tear pm the vehicles. Like really hurting the system but not participating. Very problematic behaviour.

            Thank god, not on my America!

  • SuperNerd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a brand lift study. It’s almost worthless: Hulu is paid nearly zero for it. I can’t believe they’ve stooped this low to scrape so little incremental revenue with such a customer hostile tack. Their product and analytics people must truly suck and completely lack awareness of counter metrics.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love when instagram goes: “have you heard about …?” Presumably asking this as they just showed me an ad about it that i completely ignored and i just go “no i haven’t”.

    The only use of showing me ads is them getting paid and wasting my time. I don’t pay attention to them because i either don’t need/want it, just bought it or can’t afford it.

    It’s been a long time since i bought something as a result of watching an ad.

    • geelgroenebroccoli@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The effect of ads is usually not directly linked to a specific product.

      If, for example, you need a new box of laundry detergent, you’ll go to the supermarket. There you might find brand A, which you’ve never heard of, or brand B, which had an ad you’ve seen or heard somewhere. Studies have shown you’ll be more likely to buy brand B, because you’ll find it more trustworthy, which is because you’ve heard about it somewhere.

      So, a lot of ads aren’t solely about a specific product, but also about making their brand perform better in the long run. Therefore, even if an ad is just making noise on the background, it may still have an effect on you. And, since it’s a subliminal process, it’s extremely difficult to make a concious decision to not buy products you’ve seen or heard ads of.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And, since it’s a subliminal process, it’s extremely difficult to make a concious decision to not buy products you’ve seen or heard ads of.

        Instead, I make a conscious decision to not buy products I remember seeing or hearing ads of. If you’re using subtle product placement to subliminally manipulate me in a way I don’t notice, good for you. If it’s obvious enough I remember you doing it then I will not buy your product unless it is already the best deal available (aka the cheapest per unit or best quality per price, excepting products I have had a bad experience with).

      • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah i’m too weird for ads it seems.

        I just buy whichever has the best price per kg. I make a normale mortal wage i can’t afford to get used to such luxuries like paying double to get the Nutella that actually says Nutella on it.

        I feel for everyone who makes an equal wage and doesn’t have the ability to see food as fuel.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, that’s all true, but I’ve still got 500 things I need to spend money on before buying a Lexus. Ads for luxury cars are wasted on us poors.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Somewhere someone thought this was a good idea.

    Fuck that individual specifically, fuck head…

  • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That image is 100% the academic quadrangle at Simon Fraser University. Hah.

  • Spiritsong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Somebody better tell Sony about this. I’m sure they want to cash in from their patent being infringed.

    :p /s

    The dreaded future of advertising is here. Next step, in your face as you do your daily stuffs.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m pretty sure they used to do this, at least a hundred years ago, way back when companies first realised that there’s endless free real estate for adverts on the internet. Always wondered why they stopped.