actually awesome and fast search engine (depending on which instance you use) with no trashy AI and ADs results also great for privacy, if you don’t know which instance to use go to https://searx.space/ and choose an instance closest to you

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Dig out old PC from somewhere, install some Linux distribution, Tailscale and Docker/Podman, and install SearX that way.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Oh? I tried on Vanadium and Brave (no way I’m using Chrome) and all I have is the option to “web app” it.

        Can you share the steps you used?

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          I couldn’t figure out a way in Brave, it won’t let you set a custom URL for the default browser. Firefox allowed it to just change the customer browser link in the format of

          Couldn’t find an APK to test vanadium, I assume it may be exclusive to GrapheneOS? (I just called it test for this, so name it something you’ll recognize in a few months)

          Once the Default browser is changed in Firefox/chrome, their widgets pull that information from the app, so it just searches that way.

  • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I stopped using it not because of the results but because you couldn’t swipe back without it sending you to the base website.

    On DuckDuckGo (and google n others) a search is shown in the URL like looking for frog:
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=frog&t=fpas&ia=web

    However in SearXNG it just shows
    https://searxng.world/search
    Which I don’t have an issue with, however when you click on a link and then go back to the search results it would have no idea what you searched for as it’s not in the URL and show an error.

    That aside, the UI is great. icons don’t swap around on you like Google or have annoying popups about ‘privacy’ like DDG. On the topic of search results, it was good enough for me. Not great but then again there aren’t any good search engines right now.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      If you set it as your default search in chrome or such, it will convert the Google search bar in Android to a SearXNG search bar. I started using it a little while back. Firefox never did well for me on Android (I’m sure it’s anecdotal)

  • ben_dover@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    have been using it for a while on my mobile and so far i like it better than ddg or startpage

  • sga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    If you are on a desktop, you can run it locally, you are much less likely to be rate limited, but this comes at cost of your ip being still visible to google or whatever search engine you choose to scrape from

    • Quail4789@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      IP addresses are not some super-secret PII. You don’t have to try to hide it unless you don’t want to reveal the country you’re in. You can also proxy SearXNG through tor. Though Google wouldn’t work then, and of course search time increases as well.

      • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        It’s your queries + your IP combined with the rest of the data the net collects from you that identifies you.

        • Quail4789@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Your IP is waay down the list on the fingerprint vector. Go to fingerprint.com, connect to a VPN, hard refresh the page. They’ll know you’re the same person. Nobody uses IP to fingerprint people. SearXNG mitigates a lot of the things that they actually use.

          • sga@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            I completely agree with you, and what i wrote was in haste, essentially, what i wanted to say, was that an individual running searxng does not provide the anonymity benefits you would get by using some public instance, but it it still better because you are not directly using google or whatever website, and now searxng kinda acts like a browser between you and them, which does limited conversation - there aren’t any js based fingerprinting. I also use searxng locally, i cant stand the constant rate limiting of public servers, or sometimes only a few engines are blocked, and variation in result quality is unacceptable to me. I just wanted to add that bit for transparency,

  • Kaiyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I mean it’s often better than nothing, but it is a meta search that still often uses Google or Bing to gather results. IMHO, cut off the need for that data on the whole and use an option like Mojeek

    • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Mojeek is cool, but trying to search something in my first language results in 0 results find.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      For all their talk of doing things different with their own index and rankings. Mojeek is following exactly what Google did. It’s still an ad based business model that makes users into products to be sold to advertisers. They’re good now, while still trying to build market share. But once their investors get hungry, the enshitification will commence.

      • Mojeek Search Engine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        we make money mainly from our api, our investors are patient private capital and we don’t take vc, appreciate your point but these are fundamentally different situations, our ads (when they run) will also be contextual so more of a ddg situation than a “makes users into products to be sold to advertisers”

        fair enough if it’s not for you though

        • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Do you have topics that are censored? I searched for my reddit post “what I’ve learnt from the mantis aliens”, and it does not show up in your results. Neither at google’s. But it does on other search engines. The ufo/alien stuff are censored in most search engines, while there isn’t a reason to be. That is how I judge search engines. And Mojeek doesn’t give me the results I asked for.

            • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Is that legally binding? What happens of they catch you, ban your IPs then you’re in the same situation as now. Literally no reason to not do it IMO.

              • Mojeek Search Engine@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                IP already hits a wall, also better to not get a reputation as a bad bot, it’s taken a while to get known for being friendly and respecting rules, to us you should follow robots

                • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  I seem to recall creative ways to index things without robots, e.g. browser addon that users opt into to send pages and such, essentially crowdsourcing the indexing. Anyways good to see you’re taking the high road!

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          API index access is an important difference.
          If it was only that, without public facing ad driven search, I’d be more impressed.

          Maybe if you removed the adds, and severely rate limited your own public facing search, so it’s more of a demo than an actual service. This would force you to solely make money off the API access, without directly competing against those customers.

          That would be an honest buisness model. One that doesn’t turn users into eyeballs for advertising. Which seems to me, to be the most insidious problem of the modern internet.

        • pinkystew@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I don’t know if the comparison is inaccurate.

          You make money from advertising to your users (“ddg situation” notwithstanding), are beholden to your investors (private status notwithstanding) and need to see more users to increase revenue. The person above you is saying that this model is what will drive you to eventually be as bad as Google. Do you understand?

    • ColdWater@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      You can use Mojeek with SearX Nvm with nothing enabled but Mojeek returned no results, I wonders why is that?

      • ColdWater@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I could be wrong but didn’t Mojeek also index results from Google and Bing? I’m wrong they index their own results, I mean Qwant is a search engine built in EU and they index their own results

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      5 dollars for 300 searches per month? Dafuk? And to top it up, need an actual account with email. Gets acquired in a couple of years, and all the data they gather on you gets sold. You’d be better off staying with Google.

      • alehc@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        The family plan (w/ unlimited searches) is better value. Also the whole point of charging upfront is that personal data plays no role on its business model. Ofc there’s still the risk of it being acquired but the userbase (even if small atm) is still growing and (allegedly) is now profitable.

      • weker01@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Ok I need to put my tinfoil hat on for a moment but I think there is some viral marketing going on for it on Lemmy. The frequency I see it recommended or mentioned and the unorganic way it is brought up gives me advert vibes.

        • retro@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          It’s just a really good product. I search for something and get the results I’m looking for. You don’t have to like it, but I like the product enough that I would take the time to recommend that others give it a go too.

          • weker01@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            It could be a good product. I neither hate it nor like it.

            I personally know someone in advertisement and viral marketing is more widespread than I think people realize. That is why I would like people to be sceptical about stuff that gets recommended with this kind of frequency (and IMHO with text in a tone that I’ve read in actual viral marketing campaigns) especially if the product is commercial.

            This method of advertising is used because it works and as you can see by the backlash here merely suggesting that it could be an ad and asking people to be sceptical/cautious is taken as breaking a social taboo.

        • alehc@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Lol as if that tiny company could afford that kind of stuff. Also what do you mean unorganic as the thread in question is talking about search engines? Ironically, I commented the kagi suggestion cause I barely never see it mentioned in these threads and I genuinely find it super cool and I’d like more people to try it… guess you can’t give suggestions anymore?

          • weker01@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            My intention is not to personally attack you just to get that out of the way. That is why I prefaced my statement with the tinfoil hat part.

            I don’t know if the company can afford that. I did not look into it enough but I know that viral marketing is not a very expensive marketing strategy and I hate it.

            I can speak only on my experience here on Lemmy where I hear it mentioned with a rather high frequency and in ways that suggest to me that it could be an advert.

            I will not apologize for being sceptical when it comes to commercial product recommendations and I suggest everybody do the same as viral marketing is extremely widespread in the modern net.

            • alehc@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              Yeal I get it, I find it hard to rely on online recommendations too. But still, I find it funny that I personally haven’t seen any kagi comment and you have seen enough already to grow skeptical. Because of that, and because I have enjoyed using it, I wanted to share it. Could have gone deeper on the reasons I like it but it would sound more forced/advertisy imo (e.g. “For only xyz per month you get 100% private reliable results with xyz features. I have used it for xyz months and it has never failed” etc).

              Still kinda annoying to get implied to be a bot/paid rando when sharing something cool but that’s the web

              Edit: I took a second looks to other comments and I can see that kagi is indeed mentioned quite a bit so nvm that. I’m glad to hear more people are starting to use it now :)

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Can someone explain the meaning of the name and the people having this project please?

    You’re trusting how information is filtered and funneled to you with a search tool, but a change to take lightly. Google sucks, but they have a lot to lose, a lot of eyes on them and I know generally their base motivations.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Fortunately, you can read through the source code of SearxNG and even modify it - provided that you also publish the modified version to your users if you host it publicly.

      You can run your own instance, public or private. Or you can use a public instance.

      Internally, it uses other search engines, rather than crawling the entire web and indexing everything.

  • Anon518@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I checked it out, but most of the public instances I looked at use google + bing. I think I only came across one that used Mojeek, but they deranked it so google results were still at the top.

    Yeah you can customize them – if you never clear your cookies.

    Pretty much need to self-host it to customize it.

    • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      if you never clear your cookies.

      They allow you to use a link instead for saving settings, which can also be used to set as your default search engine

      • Anon518@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I’m not seeing that option anywhere. Nor does it allow me to change the “weight”. I found a github discussion saying it should show up after you save the settings, but I tried that on two instances and didn’t get any unique URL.

        Ah, I found it under the “cookies” tab. Needs to be more obvious IMO.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Man, i wish i had the same experiencr

    The couple of times I tried it out, the search results where barely accurate