• alessandro@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sony exclusive marketing black hole,

    Epic exclusive marketing black hole…

    SQ: “uhm… I wonder why Final Fantasy IP isn’t memorable anymore”.

    Maybe a reality check around the fixed PlayStation platform being third place below to PC (Steam, not Epic) and Mobile?

    There are other publisher that stick with Sony this much? 'Cus Capcom isn’t, and their IP aren’t just great… people actually pressure for more forgotten IP from them! (Dino Crisis, MegaMan etc.)

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    I would like to help them out with that. Unfortunately it seems like Rebirth is only on PS5 and XVI has Denuvo, so my hands are tied.

  • They might have had more sales for Rebirth if they, you know, released it on everything and not just 1 system.

    I know I ain’t getting it until I can get it on PC where I have the first one and can continue my fuckin’ save.

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Pretty sure Squenix’s expectations for any game is $1 trilliondy-biliondy-milliondy dollars.

    Here’s a thought … CHANGE YOUR EXPECTATIONS!

  • Brokkr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Has any square Enix game in the past 5 years met their expectations?

    This is usually the problem with them. They have great selling games, that always fall short of their “expectations”. I’m wondering if their expectations might be wrong.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Bad expectations and probably a lack of understanding of how launching expensive games as platform exclusives can hurt sales numbers. They were likely expecting the kind of numbers a game can only get from launching on the big 3.

    • bread@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I believe I read that, in other for them to consider a game successful, it has to generate more profits than if they had just invested all funds spent on the project.

      • Brokkr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        That should be true for any company’s projects though. That’s just saying that the net present value needs to be positive. There’s no way most of their projects have been negative NPV.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Before they sold Eidos, it was all the western studios’ fault. Now this. Seems like the wrong people are in charge.

  • lamabop@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Probably would’ve done better if they hadn’t charged such insane prices for them.

    Especially FF7 rebirth lmao - a decades old game, made pretty, but still a decades old game -

    ff7 rebirth 1.3x MORE EXPENSIVE than Baldurs Gate 3 at normal prices. Out of touch motherfuckers…

    Genuinely was interested in getting ff7 until I saw the price tag, then immediately said nah fuck that and noped out for good

    • Especially FF7 rebirth lmao - a decades old game, made pretty, but still a decades old game -

      It’s so vastly different from the original game. Not just in how it looks but also the story and gameplay. It is entirely new in almost every respect outside of the basic plot premise.

        • I think it’s good. The changes to the plot are seemingly about an alternative timeline and the more the story deviates from the original, the more weird monsters show up to try and “keep things going the way they’re supposed to.” I only have the first one, though, so I’m left on a cliff hanger and can only guess what that stuff is really all about. :/

          The changes to combat are alright. Like it’s not blowing my mind but it’s also not the same boring turn-based menu system. You move and fight real time and it feels a bit like a mixture of Dark Souls and Devil May Cry.

    • bread@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      7 Remake is currently 50% off on Steam, which means it’s about the price I would accept when not on sale. Square only needs to cut another 25% or so and they’ll make a customer of me.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    should have just released to pc as well. back in the day games were released to every platform within days of each other at worst. No idea what the pc sales for ff7r were like but wait too long and enough people that would have bought the sequel will have forgotten and lost interest to affect sales numbers.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Well, you did change the story of ff7 a ton, which nobody asked for. I purposely bought the game from gamestop so Square Enix wouldn’t get my money for the game. ff16 on the other I bought on my ps5, and I thought it was great.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    My thoughts on the franchise conflict

    if there’s 16 games then I would want to start at the beginning

    7? That game is too old for me to play