OC please steal

  • Vuraniute@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not only TiVO, IIRC Tecno (the phone company) is in violation of the GPL-2.0 too by not providing device trees.

    • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Speaking of violators, North Korea is in violation of GPL 2.0 since they didn’t provide me the source code of the kernel when I asked for them for it.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Did you get a kernel binary from them? If not, I don’t think they’re bound to you by GPL.

    • f00f/eris@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tons of companies are shipping Linux without giving users access to the source code, it’s just that only one has the term “Tivoization” named after it.

      • julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thats false! There is already a link to the wikipedia article, but here is the relevant quote: „but uses hardware restrictions or digital rights management (DRM) to prevent users from running modified versions of the software on that hardware.“

        It is not a violation of the GPL 2, the license of the Linux kernel, but only the GPL 3 which was basically created for this case. Linus Torvalds is a big defender of the GPL 2 and said that Tivo provided good patches for the hardware they used.

  • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love one of the clauses of gplv3 where if a user does not follow the gpl you may deny them their ability to use it forever.

    Would be funny to strike Nintendo with that. Or any other company that likes suing people work.